How can I tell if an NDA is actually a non-compete?

An NDA is a disguised non-compete if it prohibits you from working for competitors, defines 'confidential information' so broadly it covers your general skills, or imposes 'non-solicitation' terms that effectively bar you from your industry.

Are non-competes legal?

Legality varies by jurisdiction. California, Oklahoma, and North Dakota largely ban them. Other states require them to be reasonable in scope, duration, and geography.

What should I look for in an NDA?

Look for overly broad definitions of 'trade secrets,' restrictions on using 'general knowledge' acquired during employment, and clauses that prevent you from working with specific client lists.

A TermScore is an AI-generated risk rating from 0 to 100 that evaluates the fairness and risk level of any legal document. A score of 86-100 means the contract is highly favorable, while 0-30 indicates dangerous terms you should walk away from.

What types of documents can TermScore analyze?

TermScore analyzes any legal document including freelance contracts, employment agreements, residential leases, NDAs, brand sponsorship deals, SaaS vendor agreements, and rental applications. Upload PDFs, Word documents, or images.

How much does TermScore cost?

TermScore offers a free plan with 3 scores per month. The Team plan is $15/month for 30 scores, and the Professional plan is $50/month for 500 scores with team collaboration features.

Is my document data secure?

Yes. Documents are processed in memory and analysis results are stored encrypted. TermScore never shares your document data with third parties and you can delete your data at any time from your dashboard.

How to tell if my employment NDA is actually a disguised non-compete clause?

How to Identify a Disguised Non-Compete Clause

An NDA is a disguised non-compete if it restricts your ability to work for competitors, defines 'confidential information' to include your general professional skills, or uses 'non-solicitation' language that effectively prevents you from practicing your trade in your specific industry or geographic region.

The Anatomy of a Restrictive NDA

Employers often use 'NDA' as a catch-all title for agreements that contain restrictive covenants. To determine if your document is overreaching, analyze the specific language used in the definitions section.

Red Flags in Confidentiality Definitions

Broad Scope: The definition includes 'all information learned during employment' rather than specific trade secrets.
Skill-Based Restrictions: Language that prohibits the use of 'methods, processes, or techniques' acquired while working, which effectively prevents you from using your own professional expertise.
Industry-Wide Exclusions: Clauses that define 'competitors' so broadly that they encompass almost every company in your sector.

Key takeaway: If an NDA prevents you from using your 'general knowledge, skill, and experience,' it is likely an unenforceable non-compete in disguise.

Action Item: Highlight any clause that claims ownership over your 'know-how' or 'professional development' and flag it for legal review.

Comparison: Standard NDA vs. Disguised Non-Compete

Feature	Standard NDA	Disguised Non-Compete
Scope	Specific trade secrets	General industry knowledge
Duration	Indefinite (for secrets)	Fixed term (e.g., 12-24 months)
Effect	Prevents disclosure	Prevents employment
Enforceability	Generally high	Often void/unenforceable

Jurisdictional Variations and Legal Standards

The enforceability of these clauses depends heavily on your state. Courts generally apply a 'reasonableness' test, evaluating whether the restriction is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest.

Key Jurisdictional Differences

California (BPC 16600): Almost all non-competes and restrictive covenants that restrain trade are void, regardless of how they are labeled.
New York/Texas: Courts allow non-competes only if they are 'reasonable' in time and geography and protect a legitimate interest like trade secrets or unique services.
Federal Trends: The FTC has proposed rules to limit non-competes, signaling a shift toward stricter scrutiny of agreements that function as employment barriers.

Action Item: Research the 'Blue Pencil' doctrine in your state. This determines whether a judge can strike out the illegal parts of your contract or if they must throw out the entire agreement.

Step-by-Step Analysis Process

Identify the 'Restricted Activity': Does the contract prevent you from working for a 'competitor' or just from sharing specific data?
Check the 'Confidential Information' Definition: Does it include 'general knowledge' or 'industry practices'? If yes, it is a red flag.
Evaluate the 'Non-Solicitation' Clause: Does it prevent you from contacting former clients or just from poaching them?
Assess the Duration: Does the restriction last longer than the shelf-life of the actual trade secrets?

Key takeaway: A contract that restricts your employment for 12 months or more is almost certainly a non-compete, regardless of the document title.

Action Item: Create a list of every company you might want to work for in the next two years. If the NDA would prevent you from joining them, the clause is functionally a non-compete.

Why Precision Matters

Employers often include these clauses to intimidate employees into staying. However, courts are increasingly skeptical of 'NDA-as-Non-Compete' tactics. If a clause is found to be an illegal non-compete, the entire provision may be struck down, leaving the employer with no protection at all.

TermScore uses advanced AI to instantly scan your employment contracts, identifying overbroad definitions and hidden restrictive covenants that could limit your career mobility. By highlighting these clauses in plain language, TermScore empowers you to negotiate with confidence and clarity before you sign.